Updated September 20, 2024

The current U.S. Supreme Court has gone rogue. The right-wing justices that make up the court’s supermajority frequently toy with precedent and the rule of law to issue opinions that not only defy the will of a majority of Americans, but also rewrite constitutional principles, overturn widely respected legal precedents, and gut long-standing rules that protect the public interest. In just the 2021 and 2022 Supreme Court terms alone, the Court overturned Roe v. Wade after 49 years; gutted both the decades-old Clean Air Act and Clean Water Act; overturned a 100+ year old gun safety law; eroded the National Labor Relations Act (adopted as part of New Deal reforms to protect workers); broke with their own procedures regarding standing to sue in order to block student debt relief; and reversed decades of precedent to end the decades-long practice of race-conscious college admissions policies that promoted diversity and redressed discrimination.  But this radically reactionary court and its radically reactionary justices aren’t acting alone. 

Bombshell investigations by ProPublica, the New York Times, the Washington Post, Politico, and other outlets have revealed that some of the judges on the Court are accepting undisclosed, lucrative gifts and luxury trips from powerful right-wing mega-donors — in apparent violation of federal law and the ethical obligation of judges to avoid conflicts of interest and the appearance of impropriety. These news stories typically detail the relationship between a justice and their powerful “friends” — whom we call “powerbrokers.” But the ethics problems plaguing the Supreme Court don’t end with the powerbrokers themselves.

Supreme Transparency shines a spotlight on the complex web connecting justices to powerbrokers and the organizations that those powerbrokers fund, lead, and are otherwise linked to. These organizations affiliated with the justices’ friends and benefactors frequently file amicus briefs before the Supreme Court, we sought out to document these connections and the potential influence powerbrokers exert through judicial lobbying networks.

What we found was staggering. In the 2023-2024 Supreme Court term, nearly 1 in 7 amicus briefs was filed by at least one powerbroker-affiliated organization, with these conflicted organizations weighing in on roughly two-thirds of cases. In Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo — the case that struck down Chevron — more than a quarter of the amicus briefs, including 38% of the petitioner-side briefs pushing for the eventual outcome, were filed by organizations linked to the justices’ wealthy friends and benefactors. In the cases threatening the structures of the SEC and CFPB, 41% and 35% of briefs, respectively, supporting the parties assaulting the agencies’ ability to protect the public interest from corrupt or predatory practices were filed by a powerbroker-affiliated organization.

Despite their close ties to interested parties, conflicted Supreme Court justices consistently failed to recuse themselves in cases argued before them during the 2023-24 term.

The health of our democracy depends on America having a Supreme Court whose impartiality and ethical duties are clear, transparent, and enforced. The record shows we do not have such a court right now, and this crisis in our constitutional system requires redress. 

---

Take Back the Court Foundation informs the public about the threat the Supreme Court poses to democracy and is dedicated to reforming and rebalancing the Supreme Court. Revolving Door Project scrutinizes government officials to ensure they use their office to serve the broad public interest, rather than to entrench corporate power or seek personal advancement. True North Research is a watchdog that investigates groups whose regressive agendas threaten the freedoms and institutions vital to a just and thriving democracy in America.