Supreme Transparency
  • Term
  • 2023-2024

Securities and Exchange Commission v. Jarkesy

The Security and Exchange Commission (SEC) was created in 1934 to address the reckless Wall Street practices that had triggered the Great Depression. From its inception, one of the SEC’s central responsibilities has been protecting people from securities fraud. Since Congress authorized the SEC to hear claims under that law in 1946, thousands of disputes have been resolved by administrative law judges. But in SEC v. Jarkesy, the Supreme Court has hand-picked a case to review the mechanism the SEC uses to protect investors from fraud, potentially endangering SEC authority that courts have respected for nearly 80 years. In addition to potentially weakening the SEC’s ability to protect the public, the case could open the floodgates for a wave of future litigation that could wreak havoc on the federal government’s ability to function, including crucial processes like determining eligibility for Social Security benefits.

Powerbroker-Affiliated Organizations

Organization

Americans for ProsperityRead the amicus brief

Organization

Cato InstituteRead the amicus brief

Organization

Manhattan InstituteRead the amicus brief

Organization

Competitive Enterprise InstituteRead the amicus brief

Organization

New Civil Liberties AllianceRead the amicus brief

Organization

Claremont Institute and Center for Constitutional JurisprudenceRead the amicus brief

Organization

U.S. Chamber of CommerceRead the amicus brief

Organization

Advancing American FreedomRead the amicus brief

Organization

Independent Women's Law CenterRead the amicus brief

Organization

Liberty Justice CenterRead the amicus brief

Organization

Energy Transfer LPRead the amicus brief

Organization

Americans for Limited GovernmentRead the amicus brief