Supreme Transparency
  • Term
  • 2023-2024

United States v. Rahimi

For decades, a federal law has barred people subject to domestic violence restraining orders from owning firearms. But a lower court struck down that restriction — despite the acute risk such a ruling posed to the lives and safety of survivors of intimate partner violence. Here, the Supreme Court considered whether or not to uphold that lower court ruling. This case came just two years after the Court’s disastrous ruling in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. Bruen, where it struck down a 100-year-old gun safety law and opened up the floodgates to increased gun violence.

On June 21, 2024, in an 8-1 decision, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the constitutionality of the law barring those subject to domestic violence restraining orders from firearm ownership. Justice Thomas dissented.

Powerbroker-Affiliated Organizations

Organization

Cato InstituteRead the amicus brief

Organization

Goldwater InstituteRead the amicus brief

Organization

National Rifle AssociationRead the amicus brief