Supreme Transparency
  • Term
  • 2023-2024

Sheetz v. County of El Dorado, California

When issuing building permits for new developments, the County of El Dorado, California charges “traffic impact mitigation fees” in order to finance improvements to municipal roads. A resident who applied for a building permit is suing the county, arguing that the fee violates the Fifth Amendment’s takings clause. In Sheetz v. County of El Dorado, the Supreme Court will decide the future of local government fees and could limit the ability of local governments to raise funds for infrastructure projects that help address new development.

Powerbroker-Affiliated Organizations

Organization

Buckeye InstituteRead the amicus brief

Organization

Cato InstituteRead the amicus brief

Organization

Claremont Institute and Center for Constitutional JurisprudenceRead the amicus brief