Supreme Transparency
  • Term
  • 2023-2024

Moody v. NetChoice, LLC

Consolidated with NetChoice, LLC v. Paxton

In this case, the Supreme Court considered whether to affirm a Florida law that prevents social media companies from engaging in certain types of political and disinformation content moderation (considered alongside a similar Texas law in NetChoice, LLC v. Paxton). According to Vox’s Ian Millhiser, a ruling affirming the Texas and Florida laws “would [have given] Republican policymakers sweeping and unprecedented ability to control what many American voters read about our elections and political debates,” while other experts like Robert Reich warned that siding with NetChoice’s argument “would be granting constitutional protection to nearly anything Giant Tech does — putting these huge platforms beyond the reach of lawmakers and jeopardizing the ability of Americans to control Giant Tech at all.”

On July 1, 2024, the Supreme Court unanimously ruled that neither the Fifth Circuit nor the Eleventh Circuit had conducted a proper analysis and sent the cases back to the lower courts.

Powerbroker-Affiliated Organizations

Organization

Americans for ProsperityRead the amicus brief

Organization

Cato InstituteRead the amicus brief

Organization

Competitive Enterprise InstituteRead the amicus brief

Organization

Claremont Institute and Center for Constitutional JurisprudenceRead the amicus brief

Organization

U.S. Chamber of CommerceRead the amicus brief

Organization

National Taxpayers UnionRead the amicus brief

Organization

Goldwater InstituteRead the amicus brief

Organization

Liberty Justice CenterRead the amicus brief

Organization

BecketRead the amicus brief

Organization

Center for Growth and OpportunityRead the amicus brief

Organization

Center for Renewing AmericaRead the amicus brief